Skip to content

Procurement & Buy

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

103 results found

  1. Currently notifications can be generated for a purchase requistion that has been sitting in an inbox beyond a specified number of days. This also has the option to escalate to the user's supervisor after a specified number of days.

    Unfortunately escalate only notifies the supervisor and doesnt give them rights to approve the requisiton. This must still be done by the original approver.

    This effectively means the requistion is stuck in the original approvers inbox until they take action, which seems to defeat the purpose of an escalation. We would like escalations to enable the supervisor to have approval rights.

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. The current Document Validation Rules for Purchase Requisitions for rejected lines provides a number of options on where the requisition is sent to. However this does not include returning the requistion to the original requestor.

    For us this means they are going to Post Control who then return to creator. We would like the option for this to automatically occur

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. We would like to put through a "Change request" to adjust any quantities or the values on a Purchase Order. As an example, an order for a subscription is created however when the invoice is received it was $7.22 more than the PO. It would be easier to put through a chnage request to adjust the amount using a "Change request". This would be approved in the same manner as the original PO and then be used in the matching process.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Possibility to add a comment on line level when we are doing partially goods reception and also add an attachment on line level

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. We would like the unit management (e.g. pieces, kilogram, etc.) to be linked to unique divisions. In our environment today we have four European divisions using the Procurement module. This causes problems as each country have their own units in their own local language. As the system works today all units set up under "Administration - Units" are visible to all users from all countries. This means that our French users will see Irish or Swedish units in the local languages.

    In future we will probably have 16 divisions linked to the Procurement module which will bring a tremendous amount…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Possibility to add a discount box on line level and note a gross and a net price per line.

    Also add a total discount per order

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. In the procurement module there is this fantastic option to send out Purchase Orders to the suppliers. Whilst this is a great solution, we noticed that suppliers claim to not have received any mail. this is possibly due to an incorrect email address (typo error), or because the mail was blocked by the supplier firewall/exchange server, or something else.

    Right now the only way to know is to log a ticket to the support portal.
    and as they only keep a history of 3 days, the tickets tend to fall beyond the 3 day limit (e.g. logged ticket on a…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. The 10 filters available in the inbox in version 64.0.06 are great and we would like to suggest adding to more that lean more towards the eProcurement user. The suggestions are "Requested Delivery Date" and "Confirmed Delivery Date" ("önskat leveransdatum" och "bekräftat leveransdatum")

    The quick filter options is very convenient and saves time.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Would it be possible to foresee Purchase Requests approvals related to budget numbers. Budget would be defined in ERP (Financial system) and interfaced to Medius.
    In case the available budget is less than purchase request value, special approval would be needed.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. eProcurement - Email to Supplier - Delay in responding

    Within eProcurement when we send a purchase order to the supplier we would like to receive a copy of any Bounced / Out-Of-Office notification without being subject to backscatter or other bad side effects, for example Spam.
    We would ideally like the reply to go to the person who sends the purchase order and presses the "skicka till leverantör" button, but we would consider receiving bounced / out-of-office emails into a central eProcurement mailbox that we own for example (bounced-ep@example.com).
    An alternative to the above can these bounced notifications…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. In the Procurement application we only can choose of the 4EP is on or off, but it would be nice to add limits on the 4EP like on the company level.

    For example the CFO wants to invest in an new machine arround €100.000 and than it also must approved by the CEO. That should work with the 4EP. But when the CFO want an new kepboard of €25 the CEO also need to check this little purchase.

    that would not be necessary if limits could be introduced on the requestion 4EP.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. The most companies made an own decision about the PO layout or PO number. In our opinion the layout of a PO is for every company unique, so we want to be able to customize the PO by ourselves. For example it should be easier to add your own company logo to the PO, so you could make the PO unique.

    Thereby it would be nice to change the format of the PO numbers. Now the PO numbers all starts with MF-(and than the documentnumber). It would be nice to changes that, because you could not check about which year…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. The list of addresses should be sorted alphabetically - sorting order:
    1. Name
    2. Country
    3. City

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Good afternnon:

    End users who put in purchase requisitions that are still awaiting approvals getting emails saying, "Purchase requisition REQ-58412 has been approved or rejected". It looks like it is saying the purchase requisition is authorized (approved) by their manager when in fact, it is still awaiting their approval. I have had at least 10 employees confused by this notification email. Please consider changing the wording ASAP.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. I would like to code my requisition items using a template that splits cost by a pre-set %-age.
    If I have like 20 lines on my requisition, I just want to apply the template once and it should code all my lines with the same split (as defined in the template)

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Supplier ratings are displayed underneath each item in the catalog. However, since I'm unable to click them to see the underlying comments and ratings the information available to me at the moment of requisitioning is quite limited.
    Therefore:
    I would like to be able to click the stars underneath the item and thereby display the ratings and comments on that supplier (much like what happens when I click the stars in the Goods Receipt screen).

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Comments that are added on the Requisition and Order may be important for the invoice approver to see.
    We would want all comments from Requisitions and Orders to be visible on the invoice with markers indicating the origin of the comment (so that it is clear that a certain comment is from the Requisition or from the Order).

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. In item-admin, I would like to see all historic prices that have been valid for this particular item.
    This is needed by the procurement department so that they can track the price development of each item.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. I want to be able to register future prices for items in the item-admin.
    When negotiating price updates with suppliers, the new price may be valid from next year or next quarter or whatever.
    I don't want to keep the task of updating the prices on my to-do list for months, but I would rather enter them into MediusFlow with a "valid from" date so that the item price is automatically updated with the new price a the given "valid from" date.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. We run Punchout in the Procurement module in MediusFlow and it's great.
    We would also like to send orders via integration to our suppliers and receive order confirmations via integration so that we achieve full P2P integration.

    A possible solution could include
    1. An integration message out from XI (for instance cXML) when an order is sent to supplier.
    2. A web service that can be called from the supplier or message broker to register the order confirmation.

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?