Skip to content

Procurement & Buy

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

103 results found

  1. When the approvers receive a pr for approval the information that has been added in the field additional information by the end users is not visible when you approve by your cellphone. Could this field be added so the approvers can see more information.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Users often need to see the full list of approvers relevant for their requisition directly after adding the coding of an item, even before hitting the Send button on a requisition. Thus they could easily contact approvers in case of emergency and speed up the approval process. This list should be visible on the requisition itsself both directly after coding and even after requisition is created, but also in the common All Requisitions report.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Not possible to upload images after catalogue is uploaded. We need to be able to mass update images after catalogue is uploaded

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Search engine: Not possible to search by two or more search words seperated by interval. They need to be seperated by % instead. Not logocal and hard to eremember for the users. Could % be removed and still be able to search for more words as in other Internet shops.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Today in Medius you can only set up one user at the time as temporary delegation (substitute). Our improvement suggestion is to aloud to set up several users as your temporary delegation at the same time.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. It would be great to add a possibility to change the order type (Internal x External x After the fact) on the requisitions, that are under Review step or any step before creation of the MF-order.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When using Punch-Out Catalogs, it would be nice to be able to restrict the access to certain vendors to a user, group of users, or a role. Example is IT specific vendors with Punch Out Catalog, would be restricted to only IT users.

    The solution that I know exists is to exclude users from certain punch-outs.

    In our case it would be much easier if you could do the other way round; only the users allowed to use the specific punch-out can see it. Otherwise it´s hard to administrate that on every users and exclude every new user if it´s…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. We need the option to make PO's inactive in bulk, like a bulk upload. In order for our accruals to be accurate we frequently have to run through lists of PO's to make them inactive and it is a very manual task doing them one by one.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. As a dynamic organization that handles a large volume of service invoices over extended periods, we have identified a crucial requirement for enhancing the functionality of Medius.
    We request the addition of specific fields to capture the start and end dates for service-based purchase requests. This feature is not just a mere improvement but a strategic necessity for several compelling reasons:

    Accrual Precision: Our accounting team performs accruals based on the timeframes indicated on purchase orders. With services stretching across different accounting periods, having definitive start and end dates directly on POs is indispensable for accurate accrual accounting. This precision…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. a request had been raised to add a new field to the unit admin screen - this would be a new field which will hold an on-screen description that users can see when they select the Unit from dropdowns. At the moment the current description field stores the actual Unit of measure Code that is passed onto the ERP and validated against but those codes are not immediately clear to users

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. For POs sent via CXML the delivery address (street address line, city, state and zip code) must all be filled out with legitimate address info otherwise the file will fail to send to suppliers without failure notification in Medius. These sub-fields within delivery address should all be required by default or at least able to be enabled to be required based on your environment.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Purchase Policy is a great functionality. However, it does not work that great with freetext forms as the purchase policy defined tags are not searched for except in the Free text form description.

    In order to be useful, the tags would need to be searched from within all the text fields, also the custom fields added.

    It would also be great if you instead of searching for tags also would be able to specify that a specific Purchase policy should apply for the free text form.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. It would be great if we could add the buyers' phone number to their user record so that :
    - This phone number would be shown in the PDF created for Purchase Orders.
    - This phone number could be used in the email sent to the supplier.

    Indeed, the supplier may have to contact the person who placed the order and this would avoid going through the reception or a generic number.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Don't show amount on MF-order to supplier because for some requests (budget for a year) we do not want that the supplier knows which year budget we do have in our mind.
    We would like to have the option to choose if we want to show amount on the MF-order or not.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Make reason code free field ; we want to add our internal number when we are doing a goods reception ; so if we could do that in the reason code field that would be nice.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. We want to have possible to select delivery terms when we create a purchase requestion

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. The list of addresses should be sorted alphabetically - sorting order:
    1. Name
    2. Country
    3. City

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Supplier ratings are displayed underneath each item in the catalog. However, since I'm unable to click them to see the underlying comments and ratings the information available to me at the moment of requisitioning is quite limited.
    Therefore:
    I would like to be able to click the stars underneath the item and thereby display the ratings and comments on that supplier (much like what happens when I click the stars in the Goods Receipt screen).

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Our ERP system does not have great workflow management.
    Because of this, we want to create requisitions in MediusFlow (using items from our ERP system).
    When the requisition is created, an integration message should initiate the creation of an order in the ERP system. Sending orders, confirming orders and receiving goods will then be done in the ERP system.
    Received orders will then be transferred back to MediusFlow to enable invoice matching (as is normal).

    So, in short: Only running the Requisition flow in MediusFlow but all Order management in ERP.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?