Skip to content

Sourcing

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

42 results found

    • Back button in admin centre so it does not go back to beginning (dashboard) and you have to start searching from the beginning when looking at responses in sourcing.
    9 votes
    How important is this to you?
  1. Currently there's only one way to download our reporting around setting up our new vendors. We found the Export RFX Data report, but unfortunately this cannot be amended as this is used across your whole client portfolio. We therefore would like to raise this a a Road Map item to be considered by RnD.

    6 votes
    How important is this to you?
  2. Need the ability to export/ import a questionnaire from Test into Production that comes across with all of the question configuration and branching logic.

    It is currently possible to export the question types, wording and response options from Test and upload it into Production, but it doesn't bring across all of the details - eg columns, rows, and connected questions, so you end up re-building most of the questions manually.

    You should be able to build it, test it and copy it across without any additional tweaking.

    5 votes
    How important is this to you?
  3. There isn't an export into excel feature for Suppliers - PDF only . Most suppliers need to collate details from various others and this shared media would be easier and aligns to how other organisations with sourcing portals operate.

    5 votes
    How important is this to you?
  4. The ability to move folders / sub-folders within the Questionnaire Library would be useful either via a 'drag and drop' option or a folder 'edit' choice selection.

    5 votes
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
  5. Today when you import a standard questionarie to a sourcing event you are not able in an easy way to change the ordering that the tabs is presented. You are able to download the questions to an excel and then upload it agin to change the ordering. Our improvement suggestion is to easy drag and drop to change the different tabs.

    4 votes
    How important is this to you?
  6. Event Alerts are based on submission date and don't appear to be impacted by status. This means that alerts are received by suppliers where not relevant and depending on circumstances could cause significant issues.

    4 votes
    How important is this to you?
  7. There are many automated messages built into the system but there are circumstances whereby such automated messages may cause issues with a supplier. It would be valuable to be able to 'opt out' of any automated message if needed, i.e. prior to an automated message sending we get a pop up box saying that the automated message will send with an option of Ok or 'Do Not Send Message'.

    4 votes
    How important is this to you?
  8. It would be great to have the option to remove the Requestor Phone Number field from the Procurement Request form in Demand Capture. (Or at least make it non mandatory.) We rarely use the phone in our organisation and it's a minor annoyance to have to enter something in that field.

    4 votes
    How important is this to you?
  9. Being able to schedule the start of an event automatically rather than manually.

    4 votes
    How important is this to you?
  10. Currently the pricing template functionality is suited more for commodity purchases, e.g. Description of item - price per item - quantity of items - total price for items. It totals all lines together to give the full total which drives the assessment graphs.

    It doesn't cater for price options or rate cards, which is an 'either/or/optional' scenario, meaning pricing assessment is done without being able to use Medius tool functionality or automation, e.g. attaching manual spreadsheets and manual assessment.

    4 votes
    How important is this to you?
  11. In Quick Quotes once a QQ is live you cannot add any additional 'supplier visible' attachments, although you can add in 'Internal Attachments'.

    It would be extremely useful to be able to add supplier visible attachments once a QQ is live (published), especially as there is no 'communication' function within QQ's.

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
  12. Today you are not able to to search on Tags in Sourcing Projects.

    We are using tags according to our internal categorization, which was the best solution according to Medius. For a category Manager to search on their respective Categories, this function should be vital for the Sourcing Platform usage.

    /Björn
    Dellner Couplers

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
  13. When suppliers log into Medius to complete multiple questionnaires for onboarding purposes, we need a better way to easily guide them to the correct tabs or section. Despite sending screenshots and userguides, we still have to hand hold them. Can this be enhanced so that it is one all encompassing tab for policies, terms and conditions and also questionnaires for them to select to complete? E.g. combine Header and Questions tab into one and make this the 1st default page they see when they log in?

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
  14. Currently in a sourcing event you can only award whole numbers e.g. 96 but not 95.9. even though within the 'Line' items (for pricing) of an event you can set the score to a decimal number but cannot then award a decimal number, we have to provide a whole number (see attached screenshots).

    In the examples provided we have set line 'price' to an available 95.5 marks, within the awarded scoring whilst it states that 96 marks are available you cannot enter 96 as the maximum is 95.5, but we also cannot enter 95.5 as it will only accept whole…

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
  15. When exporting the metadata from the reporting dashboard, this data should include everything. Tags, Description etc.

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
  16. The current default font is too small to read.

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
  17. The supplier records are supposed to be a central repository however it only allows supplier contacts to be Supplier Users. There should be a separate place within the central supplier records to add supplier contacts for information only that do not need to be Supplier Users (and don't need to receive any auto-generated emails, logins, etc). For example, a supplier account manager may be a Supplier User but a member of the Delivery team, Customer Success team, Project Manager (where we may need easy access to their contact information - job title, email, tel) will unlikely need to be a…

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
  18. It would be great if Procurement Requests could be linked to Sourcing Events and Contracts, e.g. via a hyperlink, so that you can more easily view the original request that triggered the sourcing event or contract. Alternatively, could the Procurement Request be added as a file to the subsequent sourcing event and contract.

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
  19. There are pre-configured reports for Header/Section level views of scoring (under Responses Tab) and question level scoring reports under the "Analysis" tab but what is missing is the next level down, individual evaluator scores and commentary reports split by questions across suppliers.

    The key use of these would be as a quick and easy view for consensus scoring sessions. Without a bespoke report the only way to achieve this today is to view a question at a time using "scoring overview".

    3 votes
    How important is this to you?
← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?